Custom Search

Sunday, 7 December 2008

MANIPURI MEITEIS IN BANGLADESH

Introduction:
Manipuri or Meitei Community of Bangladesh are neither 'Upojati' nor Tribal nor Indigenous nor Adivashi as they originated from Manipur, where they are not tribals but the dominating community. Bishnupriya Community of Bangladesh are neither Manipuri nor Meitei but 'Bishnupriya' or may be called 'Lepnai' as they originated from outside Manipur but through Manipur to Bangladesh; that is the reason, perhaps they are calling themselves 'Manipuri'. For socio-economic purposes of the Bangladesh Government, Meiteis may be treated as 'Socio-economically Backward Community' since the majority of them are now 'Below the Poverty Line'.


Geography:
The Meitei community lives in the flat farmlands of Sylhet division, mainly in Moulvibazar district of Bangladesh. They also reside in a few villages in the other three districts of Sylhet division. The vast majority of Meitei villages are easily accessible by public buses and/or rickshaws, as they are close to main roads and towns. Living on flat farmland—and in Bangladesh one is never too far from a sizable river—their villages are prone to the yearly flooding that afflicts most of Bangladesh. In Kamalganj subdistrict of Moulvibazar district, which is the population and cultural center of the Bangladesh Meitei community, the Dhalai river flows through the heart of the Meitei community, bringing both life and destruction. In India, the Meitei live primarily in Manipur. There they are the majority, and their language is the official language and the language of wider communication among the various ethnic communities. This is the reason why Meitei speakers call themselves Manipuri. Imphal is the capital city in Manipur and the center of Meitei culture, language and society.
The geographical origin of the Meitei-speaking people in Bangladesh is the area that is now Manipur in India. Manipur is universally recognized as the hub of Meitei language, culture, and education. One simply cannot talk about the Meitei without mentioning Manipur. Manipur was previously known by various names (Kyangleipak, Kyangkleipang, Kyanglei, Meitrabak, and Mekhali). One theory is that the land was named Manipur by missionaries who arrived there from Sylhet during the reign of Maharaj Garibniwaz in the first half of the eighteenth century (Islam 2003:409). Farooque Ahmed writes: “Manipur is one of the oldest civilizations in Southeast Asia and has a long history of monarchy before coming under British imperialism in 1891 and merging into India in 1947. Traditional Puya attributes this land with the first anointment of a king in 33 AD. His successors started the process of nation building by conquering all the clan territories in the valley that was completed in the 15th Century. Her territory saw its greatest expansion in 1475 with the annexation of Kabow valley by Garibniwaz Pamheiba and lost that territory in 1834. The reference to losing the territory in 1834 gives a hint as to how the Meiteis ended up in Bangladesh. Manipuris migrated to Bangladesh and settled at different times due to wars, conflicts and socio-political reasons. Their migration started during the reign of Rajarshi Baghyachandra (1764–1789) and the process was accelerated by the Manipur-Burma War (1819–1825) which is a black chapter in the history of Manipur. After the war with Burma, Manipur was ruled by the Burmese invaders for about seven years. During that period, King Chourajit Singh along with two younger brothers, Marjit Singh and Gambhir Singh took refuge in Sylhet. A hoard of Manipuri subjects followed them. A palace was built at that time at Mirzajangal of Sylhet town. After fleeing war and its effects, the Meitei put down roots in present-day Bangladesh, mostly in Sylhet division, as one of the forty or so language groups of Bangladesh. Of course, as they witnessed India’s independence from the British, experienced the years as East Pakistan, and finally the birth of Bangladesh as a nation, their post-Manipur years have also been fraught with great historical turmoil.

History:
The history of a people, a language, and a land is never perfectly clear or universally agreed upon. Whether it is eyewitness accounts of events or interpretation of those events by historians, there is rarely only one point of view. This is not simply an academic exercise of disagreeing over past events. The causes behind divergent views of history are often far more meaningful because history can have a significant bearing on the present as well as the future. Writing about the history of the Meitei in Bangladesh is tricky because they and the Bishnupriya are mired in just such a disagreement. As both the Meitei and Bishnupriya have admitted, there are political reasons for the current division and disagreement. Both groups want the name Manipuri attached to their group, and language, as there are certain economic and political advantages to being so recognized by the Bangladesh government. The Bishnupriya in general do not seem to mind sharing the Manipuri name with the Meitei. However, there are several strong voices among the Meitei rejecting the notion that the Bishnupriya should in any way be considered Manipuri.

People:
There are about 50,000 Meiteis (Pangan also) in Bangladesh according to an unconfirmed source. A research project very recently identified as much as the least number. They predominantly rely on rice farming for much of their livelihood although there are a fair number of businessmen as well. Most of them live in villages. Their life style is not as integrated members of a wider Bangladeshi community. There are very few who live in a large city such as Dhaka. This kind of living pattern seems typical among the speakers of traditional languages of Bangladesh. The facial features of the Meitei leave no doubt that they are not native to Bangladesh. They originally came from the east from a predominantly Mongoloid stock. The Banglapedia explains that “ethnologically Meitei belong to the Kuki-Chin group of the Tibeto-Burman family of the Mongolian race. But a good admixture of Aryan and other blood groups took place in the mainstream of Manipuri nation”. It is not however true in the real sense of the term “Meitei.” Meitei woman used their traditional clothes. The majority Meiteis are Hindus. In recent years Sanamahism (ancient Meitei faith) increased tremendously due to revivalism influence coming from Manipur where the faith originated. In addition, the Lai Haraoba festival is also important.
Pangan:
Among the people of Meitei the Pangan whose religion is Islam have a different facial structure of Bengali. They are of foreign origin of war captives (during the Mughal Rule in India) in Manipur. In Bangladesh locality sometimes they are called ‘Khai Bangal’. They are mostly Sunni Muslims. Eid remains their annual festival of all importance. The Moulvi conducts their marriage and circumcision. They have customs and observances inherited from their first ancestors who were Meitei women. In Bangladesh also they live in Moulvi Bazar district only. They with the other Hindu Meiteis and the Lepnai people (Bishnupriya) migrated from Manipur during the Seven Years Devastation of 1819-26 AD. Male cultural dresses are different from that of the Meiteis. Pangan men and women are extremely expert in agriculture and handicrafts.
Language:
Meitei is one of the eighteen major languages of India, recognized by the Government of India. There is a little difference in pronunciation between the Meitei spoken in Bangladesh and the Meitei spoken in Manipur in India and it is due to language environment. Pure Meitei language is however widely used in their villages. Meitei speakers are praying or conversing at home or with neighbors. Meitei children do appear to continue to speak Meitei as their best language, which is an indication that the Meitei language is not being lost. On the other hand, Meitei speakers acknowledge the need to know other languages, primarily Bangla. They tend to feel that Bangla should be the medium of education in primary schools, and that it is okay for their children to speak another language better than Meitei. There is not a single School in Bangladesh teaching in their own language of Meitei. Meitei children attend Bangla-medium schools. They are all fluent in Bangla. As a result, they will be less apt to use Meitei widely. Younger people are more literate in Bangla than in Meitei, it is likely that they will learn a broader vocabulary and become increasingly fluent in Bangla. Over time, this will be a threat to the vitality of the Meitei language in Bangladesh. Meitei speakers express positive attitudes towards their children’s learning to read and write in Meitei. They seem to think this would be good for the children themselves and for the Meitei community as a whole. Meitei adults also appear to be interested in learning to read and write in Meitei, especially if they were taught using the (traditional) Meitei script. Thus, while acknowledging the need and even desire for other languages, mother-tongue Meitei speakers also express some pride in their own language. Bilingualism study Meitei speakers in Bangladesh feel they are bilingual and even multilingual, as nearly all say they speak some Bangla and as many speak other languages, too. They however do write comfortably in Meitei though majority has a good command of Bangla. They can easily understand local Bangla in a variety of situations, and they are generally understood by mother-tongue Bangla speakers. Many of these people have passed their Secondary School Certificate (SSC) exams in Bangla only. Now all have a very good proficiency in Bangla but in the next generation Meitei may substitute Bangla due to increasing phenomenon of learning Meitei in Meitei Script and high flow of electronics media from Manipur where film albums have been developed commercially. Manipur Government also did not disturb it. In Bangladesh the Government has no idea of establishment of Meitei medium Schools till date. Meitei children are missing learning in their own mother tongue. Meitei language is a language of instruction in schools, colleges and universities up to Ph D level and also at the highest Civil Service levels, like IAS (Indian Administrative Services), IFS (Indian Foreign Services), IPS (Indian Police Services), MCS (Manipur Civil Services) and MPS (Manipur Police Services) etc. in India. Mass media, culture, films, songs, and music videos are produced. In Bangladesh, however, it is still primarily an oral language, used exclusively by and within the Meitei community only. They are using Bengali script, which displaced their Meitei script in the eighteenth century during the reign of King Pamheiba (Garibniwaz) in Manipur. Meitei script is absolutely unique to the Meiteis. The Banglapedia noted, “a characteristic feature of the old Manipuri script is that each and every alphabet is named according to a limb of the human body. Their shapes are also in consonance with those of the limbs” (410). Here is a sample of the script, which is known as Meetei Mayek:


Manipur reintroduced the script in schools. In Sylhet division where Meiteis are residing, some social workers started teaching the script under trained teachers without getting any help from the government. We hope the Government may patronize them.

Dr R Renatus Sanabam
Independent Researcher
28 July, 2008




Sources: Internet

Friday, 5 December 2008

LAND, PEOPLE AND LANGUAGE OF MANIPUR

Land:
Meitei Leipak (Meeteiland), Kangleipak, Kathe, Ponnas, Hsiao Po-lo-mein, Cassay, Moglai, Mekle etc. of about 22 names were its names in different ages. 74 Monarchs ruled the land from 33 AD till 1949. Location is latitude 23.83° and 25.68° (North) and in longitude 93. 03° and 94.78° (East), with an area of 22,327 sq. km. The capital Imphal lies at 24.82° north latitude and 93.95° east longitude and it must follow + 6.30 hours of GMT, but now follows + 5.30 GMT. What a surprise!
The land has been under the siege of India since 15 October 1949, for about 59 years now. A puppet government of India called Manipur Government is administering it without being truthful. It was under British protection from 1891 until 15th August 1947, for about 56 years. Manipur was independent with mixed feelings for about 2 years from 1947 till 1949 and conducted a General Election of its Parliament under a very old political system. All went to India which apparently created a political turmoil since then. There shall be no peace in Manipur without an Independent Government of its own. The people have a good experience of it. Development process and economic planning are all colonial totally. Not a single major industry, much less an important establishment has been established in Manipur. Whereas several hundreds of crores of rupees have been spent apparently on paper maintained for the record in order to refuel and recycle their colonial apparatus, quite a few families in Manipur are also used as colonial subsidiaries, the economic condition of the average people of Manipur especially those in the hill areas has not improved even upto the level of subsistence. People survive on grassroots in the Manipur hill areas because of colonial economic process. The Manipuri hill-men and plainsmen are divided by the Presidential approval to a divisive law– Manipur Land Revenue and Land Regulation Act, which debar plainsmen to seek access to Manipur hills. The apartheid has been created. All natural resources of Manipur can be exploited by the Indian Government only. Manipur has to develop on subsistence economy.
People:
Population is about 22, 93, 896 comprising of Meetei 60% and tribes and Muslims with others the rest 40%. Socially the Indians are Mayangs, meaning foreigners. Meeteis are Mangang, Luwang, Khuman, Moirang, Leishangthem, Angom and Khaba Nganba along with some foreign origin population of Pangal (Manipuri Muslims) and Bamon (Brahmins). Tribes are Tangkhul, Maring, Mao, Maram, Thadou, Kuki, Mizo, Moyon, Anal, Kom, Koireng, Zemei, Lengmei, Longmei, Purum, Paomai, Hmar, Zou, Paite etc. There are Nepalis who migrated illegally from outside. About 35 ethnic groups construct the society.
National Liberation Movement started since 1949. Manipur Nationalist Party demanded the revocation of Manipur Merger Agreement. A Christian leader and former Chief Minister, Yangmaso Saiza also took part. The masses voiced their protests, partly democratic and partly militant in the later 1960s. The movement turned out pro-active. Meetei State Committee, Revolutionary Government of Manipur (RGM) based in Bangladesh during the Pakistan time, Revolutionary People’s Front (RPF), UNLF, KYKL, PREPAK, KCP and KUKI outfits are prominent. RPF is the political wing of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of Manipur. PLA started armed struggle in 1978. Full scale armed resistance was very active across the valley of Manipur with the ‘DAWN’ [a monthly publication] distributed to all embassies located in Delhi. A combined militancy called Manipur People’s Liberation Army [MPLA] of RPF, UNLF, KYKL and PREPAK opposed the Indian military occupation in Manipur by occupying a certain territory along the Myanmar border. They claimed the de facto sovereignty of Manipur running a parallel like underground government under separate flags and titles of authority. Several hundred of freedom fighters were martyred for a common cause though India declared them unlawful. While suppressing them, India violated human rights as routine work. Draconian Laws like Armed Forces Special Powers Act [AFSPA], Punjab Security Act, Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, and National Security Act took repressive roles for India’s security. Extra judicial killings, third degree tortures, molestations, rape, genocide, assault and mass killings were carried out in society. Innumerable Indian troops are now operating in Manipur. India is using alcohol, drugs, money, sex and many other inhuman methods as counter insurgency action plan to weaken and demoralize the youths of Manipur. Such counter insurgency operations spread HIV and AIDS instead.
Socio-economic and Political Colonization deprived the inalienable political freedom of the people of Manipur resulting to the looting of the unlimited natural resources, the vast national wealth of Manipuri nation. Those unlimited resources were for the people’s self-determination and self sufficiency. India never appointed any Meetei of Manipur to any important position. India enslaved Manipuri economically so that State Terrorism could run systemically introducing and enforcing colonial laws and rules. Under AFSPA, a non commissioned officer can kill anybody on suspicion or out of hatred without any judicial process or legal sanction. It resulted to the extra-judicial torture and execution of the innocent. It affected the economy to the bottom line. Common people are now below the poverty line. Jobless and unemployed are at the top of daily agenda. Blockade and bund clash with the government. Farmers are not active in the fields. Irrigation and road development failed. Institutions are sinking. Youths fled homes. India again created quotas of ‘Scheduled Castes’ and ‘Scheduled Tribes’ thereby killing the work culture totally. On the other hand there is a captive market of the Mayangs who are all Hindu leaders.
Language:
Meiteilon or Meeteilon means Meetei language is also called ‘Manipuri’ and sometimes, the 19th century British term, Meithei, which is the name of the people, is the predominant language and lingua franca in the southeastern Himalayan kingdom of Manipur, in northeastern India. It is the official language in government offices. It is also spoken in Assam and Tripura, Bangladesh and Myanmar. It is the official language of Manipur along with English. The language has a long history of Literature and is offered as a subject upto Post-graduate level (Ph.D.) in Universities and colleges of India, apart from being a medium of instruction up to the undergraduate level in Manipur. All the tribes and people inhabiting Manipur use the language for communication to each other. English Language is also slowly gaining ground. India included it in the list of Major Indian Languages by the 71st amendment of Indian Constitution in 1992. Meetei Mayek is now officially recognised as Manipuri script. It was used in ancient times, not in vogue for a certain period, now gained popularity. There are 29 different dialects spoken in Manipur. The Government of Manipur recognised six main dialects only for medium of instruction and examination purposes up to class V. They are, Tangkhul (language of Tangkhul people), Hmar (language of Hmar people), Paite (language of Paite people), Lushai (language of Lushai people), Thadou/Kuki (language of Kuki people), Mao (language of Mao People). Meitei-lon has proven to be a large integrating factor among all ethnic groups in Manipur. India Government imposed Hindi as the Indian national language, which exists officially. However the language has not gained ground in social activities due to threats from the armed insurgents. The language should not be confused with another Indo-Aryan origin language, known as ‘Bishnupriya’, which is neither Manipuri nor Meiteilon at all. A different community called Bishnupriya inhibited in remote areas of Jiribam district of Manipur and outside Manipur used it as a spoken dialect. The Pangals are all Muslims speaking Meeteilon as their mother tongue since they descended from their first ancestor of Meetei women. They called Manipur motherland not fatherland. Meeteis and tribes are identical anthropologically but not the other ones. Mayangs speak Hindi, otherwise Meeteilon in public. Scholars opined that Meiteilon is a tonal language similar to many languages around the world except Europe, Middle East, South Asia and the Pacific. Chinese is perhaps the most well-known of such languages. In Europe, Norwegian, Swedish, Lithuanian, Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, some dialects of Slovene possess elements of tonality, but this is in most cases better understood as a pitch accent. A Franconian language in Limburgish of France plays tones an important role. Other Indo-European tonal languages, spoken in the Indian subcontinent, are Punjabi, Lahanda and Western Pahari. Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai, Lao, and Burmese are of the same group of tone. Mongolian, Khmer, Malay, standard Japanese and Korean are not. Tibet is tonal, while the dialects of the West are not. In the Japanese of Tokyo, tonal patterns are adapted to multi-syllable words. Mandarin has four tones, similar to Thai's without the middle tone. Cantonese has at least 8 tonal contours: high even, high falling (which is becoming obsolete, and changing to high even), high rising, middle even, middle rising, low even, low falling and low rising.
Conclusion:
Peace would be a far cry in Manipur for many years to come. Socio-cultural colonization is the main cause. Proxy elections are conducted by spending crores of Indian rupees in order to perpetuate colonization through quislings, puppet regimes and fifth columnists thereby misleading the illiterate electorate. India in no way will be able to justify its election since the people of Manipur cannot exercise their ‘independent political will.’ Several thousand of mercenaries, subversives and spies are secretly or openly working in Manipur to maintain law and order, in the process human rights are violated grossly with fake encounters everyday.
Prayer:
Lord! Thank you very much for allowing me to pray for the people of Manipur especially for those who have been the victims of armed conflict and human rights violations in Manipur.
Dr. R Renatus Sanabam
Independent Researcher

Monday, 1 December 2008

ANCIENT MEETEI SOCIETY OF MANIPUR

Introduction: Meetei society started with the concept of creation theory that said the Meetei forefathers were born itself, they never migrated from some other parts of the world. Since time immemorial till this time they have been in possession of their Seven Yeks (amalgamated from nine salais) that was said originated from Kangleipak-Imphal.1 These Yeks were Seven Tribes who played prominent social and political roles in the formation of Meetei Khunai (Meetei Civilization). It grew in and around villages. They were a fine race of people, the cleanest of the clean people of that time, both in person and life style.2 Their costume and dress were very simple and peculiar in uniqueness. However the common mass wore the same class of loin clothe irrespective of social position or economic status. In early times, the standard of a bride was adjudged by the quality of clothe she wore, and that of a groom was decided by the skill of martial arts, called Mukna-Kangzei.3 The unmarried girls bore a side-lock hair style, called Shai Kakpa as a symbol of preservation of virginity.
Some Social Norms: In the beginning of the eighteenth century the killing of a Brahmin was a gravest offence, it was capital punishment. Even the King had to abdicate the throne to absolve himself from the sin of killing a Brahmin.4 However, the society did not allow the supremacy of the Brahmin.5 Customarily all the subjects had to pay respects to their King by bowing down before him. Muslims were exempted from it and allowed to do only "Salam".6 The worship of Sanamahi deity by a prince was regarded as a sure preliminary to an attempt by the worshipper on the throne, and was reserved for the King alone.7 Even after the acceptance of Vaishnanism; Panthoibi, Sanamahi, Umanglai along with some other deities occupied due proposition. Another deity called Pakhangba also was considered to be the sacred soul of ruling chief of Manipur. In the National Flag of Manipur there was a picture symbolizing Pakhangba. These deities were side by side worshipped by the Meetei Hindus.8
The society or the state was neither a contract nor an organism.9 The King was believed to have been appointed by God as King and sent by God for reinging the country. The King was God to his people. Sometimes the King was elected on the basis of democracy. There were organizations, rules and obligations, law for pleasing the King and for bringing up the Meetei culture. To preserve the long standing custom and tradition is the rule of law of Meetei Society.
Social Formation: The society developed from a stage of tribal status. The legal system between the period of the primitive and the age of the enforcement of the Indian Constitutional law was solely based on rites, moral precepts, usages, customs, memory and King’s command.
The society was dynamic because it was sufficient for livelihood. Agriculture depended solely on monsoon rain and without rural organisation there was no sufficiency that was the limbs of Meetei Civilization. Rice produce was amazing. There was no famine if there were no war. Articles were sold at cheap prices. In the markets there were two systems of exchange, one by articles and another by coins. The power of nobles and the feudal system were a living practice till recently. The laborer and their wages were at the wills of the King and the nobles. The cottage industry was remarkably developed in primitive style. In the result the primitive handloom and handicraft products carried an extraordinary charm. In the forests, precious timbers were available in plenty. The lakes supplied all the demands of fish consumption to the country.
Foreign Relations: There was foreign relationship from early times. Some local products were a good choice of the Brishers and of the Myanmarese (Burmese) as well. Communication and external affairs were the business of the King. Most areas of the country were remote hills and rural boundaries without a habitation. The King and the deities were being kept or stayed in the buildings, whereas the common people lived only in the thatching and kuccha houses. Gold, silver and precious stones were meant for the King and his descendants for foreign exchange. Sanitary was at its zenith except in the hilly and Loi regions.
Administration: Various laws were dictated from time to time. The King and his royal family on the one hand, and the poor commoner and the few middleclass families on the other, formed the early administration. The Piba (kinship), Pana (local administration), Lalup (compulsory free military service), Meenai (servant), Naithang (slavery) and the state services, among many others were the sources of law. Without the consent or command of the King, operation of the Executive, Legislative and Juidiciary remained with limitations. If the customary laws were violated, the law breaker was made outcaste, killed or exiled. There was no such right of the present time. Slavery and human sacrifice were in vogue. Many organizations were extant for gracing the King. The obligations of Laiharaoba (appeasing the god) rites were considered as higher than the prevailing laws of the country. The waging of war against the ruling King was common.
Status of Women: Married women controlled the local markets where only edible local products were sold. Markets weare meant for womenfolk. However there were morning market, day market, evening market and night market, which were run by married women only. In paddy fields and in all walks of life, except war, women played greater roles than the men-folk.
The hill women were not in the same footing socially and politically. There were various departments to look after the Pangals (Muslims), Lois (outcastes) and Cheengmees (hill-men). There was a peculiar type of secularism, and it helped while maintaining the peace to a great extent. Prohibition of liquor, suppression of immoral traffic acts, prevention of gambling and eradiction of theft were the negative functions of the state, because it remained in hands of the society mainly women. However, royal verdicts were enforced to check and punish the offenders.
Art and Culture: The Meetei art and culture forms were the charms of the other world. Both men and women played games and sports, danced together and devoted in their spare time in music and community services. The society was a society of war invasion; every house was a centre of learning martial arts and cultural activities. On the other hand, the society was always freed from foreign subjugation, because even at the time of political subjugation the society remained independent. All men were directly or indirectly a warrior of the country. To die in the battlefield, was considered martyrdom, followed by the highest gallantry award in life. To go even in the battle field was considered removal of serious sins. Behind them stood the women folk as the social guardian in the absence of men folk due to emergency or war.
Marriage System: There was no practice of child marriage. Women gained a social status. There was a simple form of divorce after marriage. Re-marriage of divorcee and widows in a different form of Loukhatpa was allowed only after elopment by mutual consent. There was another form, called Keina Katpa performed within hours just after elopment or just before the elopment. There was a total absence of casteism on social basis.10 The adoption of Hinduism as the State religion by a royal edict (1705 A.D.), gave a severe blow upon the social and political life of the Meetei people for a considerable many years till the present time. It separated them from the wild but simple hill tribes inhabiting the hills around the valley located in the heart of Manipur. However, by the continual existence of the belief of Sanamahi-Pakhangba, the society remained keeping saved from the ruins of ancient practices and superstitions.11 The advent of Christianity very fast in the hills marginalised the ancient system of marriage to a large extent.
Oxygamy was in practice. Two great esamples are, the queens of King Nongda Lairen Pakhangba of 33 A.D and King Naothingkhong of seventh century A.D., were all of outside origin; the latter's queen called Chingurembi was a Hindu Princess of outside origin, who also had brought ten attendants belonging to Hindu community. All of them settled in Manipur and their descendants became Meeteis.12 The Meeteis asserted their pride and racial superiority even to their own wives. Such characteristics were the common familiarity of all the primitive tribes.13
Re-marriage of women was a common practice. A woman could marry as many times as she pleased or circumstances compelled.14 At the time of primitive society raiders occasionally attacked and killed the males, women were then carried away as wives, maids or concubines. Women population was nearly a commodity. Very often women reared up children of several husbands. However, the morals of the women were protected by some sort of means as morality changes with time and space. The social condition of Meetei progenitors were extremely primitive.15
Alternative English Records: Three varieties of sacrifice were extant around first century A.D. They were, the Charat (human sacrifice), the Karat (animal sacrifice) and the Marat (cattle sacrifice). The practice stopped at the advent of Poireiton in the first century A.D.26 The then Political Agent Sir James Johnstone commented on slavery as follows:
"Slavery of a mild form existed in Manipur, the slaves being hereditary ones, or people, and the descendants of people who had sold themselves for debt, their services being placed as interest for the debt. Very commonly a Naga marries a girl of another Naga village, thereby incurring a debt of forty rupees to the father, debt being the price of a Naga bride. The man not being able to pay, his father-in-law says, "Sell you, and pay me". This is done and the man pays the forty rupees and has towrk for his master till he can pay the debt, something being sometime allowed for subsistence, or they agree upon a monthly payment, which if not paid is added to the principal. The wife probably works and supports his family, and, if the creditor is a fairly good fellow, things go smoothly, and the debtor never attempts to fulfil his obligations more than he can help. The law allows man to transfer his services to anyone who will take up the debt. Great abuses arose because the master took advantage of the corrupt courts to bind the slaves more and more securely in the chains of debts, afnd then every effort was made to escape. Someitmes cases of very cruel ill-treatment happened, quite contrary to the laws. A female child of only 4 years old was stolen from the custody of the widow mother by the creditor for a debt of nine rupees owed to her deceased father. Such instance of slavery was totally abolished at the instance of the Britain Political Agents in Manipur."17
Clans and Classes: There were seven yeks, nine salai (s), and four pana (s), Phungganai (s), Potshangba (s), Ayokpa (s) and Kei (s). Those were the results of two composite cultures, one from the east and another from the west. All the immigrants were allowed to join in a particular yumnak (surname) and after joning became a Meetei. The Salai could claim their rights guaranteed by religion. Phungganai, Ayokpa and Kei were all belonged to the security group of temporary status for the King. In Phunganai the eldest son of the same parents became Loinaba (close associate) of the King; the second became Lalup (free-laborer) and the third one Nai (slave) of the King. They were given as dowry or gifts token while distributing prizes. Potshangba did the work of watching the belongings including Royal Firms of different varieties. Ayokpa came from the hill people. They were allowed to cultivate one pari (2.5 acres) of paddy field per head. Kei was the servantship of the King.
Social Relationship: Though classless and casteless society they possessed, were more or less influenced by the out-siders. They used certain types of language, calling some of them as Imphal Macha, Lawai Macha, Hao Macha, Loi Macha, Yaithibi Macha or Bamon Macha. All the names carried both positive and negative meanings of the term. The positive side of Imphal Macha was the man who was a resident of Imphal City and qualified as a gentleman, whereas its negative side indicated the rude attitude of the man towards his fellowmen. The positive of Lawai Macha was one who was a sincere and honest villager, whereas its negative carried the meaing of most uncivilized person in the society. The positive of Hao Macha was one who was a very faithful hillman, whereas its negative was one possessed by an odd character. The positive of Loimacha was the man who was adorned with pure qualities of citizenship, whereas its negative side carried the socially boycotted people. The positive of Yaithibi Macha was the person who represented as bad omen to the foreign invaders, whereas its negative disclosed the outcasts (tanthoklaba) in the society. The positive of Bamon Macha was the priestly class who looked after the Radha-Krishna temple, whereas its negative showed us the cook in the services of the society. There was no personal classification amongst them except the Bamon Macha. Any Yaithibi, Loi, Hao or Lawai Yaithibi, Loi, Hao or Lawai may become the socially high Imphal Macha (city dweller), if he or she resides in Imphal city.18
The Loi Community: Historically the Lois settled in the horizontal areas of Manipur valley, the Yaithibis settled in Haochongban, Shamupal and Thoubal Khunou villages. Most of them had different curb dialects of their own tongue in Meetei language, which was otherwise their mother tongue, but quite similar to Burmese language.19 Phayeng, Leimaram, Sugnu, Andro, Thangga, Selloi, Khurkhul, Yaithibi, Kakching, Moirang, Sekmai (Awang and Nongpok), Chakpa, and Kwatha were important Loi villages. However, in the real sense they did not carry the negative concept of Loi by person now-a-days, since the negative mandate was issued by the time when there was monarchy in the country. The people of Moirang and Kakching were not treated as Loi people but the place they lived in. Unlike Andro and Awang Sekami peoples they were not Loi people on the ground that only the pure blood of Meetei race originally settled in these villages. Only the historical Kings made them joined by immigrants coming from Burma, China and the West.20 Besides them the kings sent the offenders to them as a sort of penalty in exile, who were consequently turned out a sizeable number before the end of monarchical rule in Manipur that lasted after centuries. There were such other informal forms of people different from mainland Meeteis, called Heirok, Khangabok, Ningthoukhong or Bishnupriya or Lepnai, whose origin were considered from the west (India). They were assigned Meetei surnames and recently have accustomed the Meetei way of social life.21 They also had a different dialect of Meetei language.
Primitive Institutions: The primitive institutions sarted from their family (Mayum Phungga) with special reference to human person's relationship with the family norms because 'Phungga' was the origin of all families in Meetei society.22 By instituting a Phungga (hearth but a shrine) the norms of family law started distinctly. Around the Phungga, there were the rooms for unmarried daughters and sons separately from the rooms of the parents, and kitchen and so on. The family having a phungga was regarded associated with the ancient laws of their forefathers, whereas the family having no phungga was regarded as a family without such a law.
The Sagei Piba (head of the clan) occupied a unique position in the institution of Phungga. He was the head of a number of phunggas belonging to the same surname. Again, the King was the head of all the Pibas who were in hundreds. They used to keep such Puyas called Yumdaba and Yumkhai, and by the interpretation of these Puyas any injustice in Pibaship was ruled out. The Pibas were the religious head within the jurisdiction of their clan. Subsequently, the Meetei family law developed with such organs of Luhongba (valid marriage), Loukhatpa (recognition of or voidable marriage), Khainaba (divorce), Hanjinnaba (restitution of conjugal life), Aoonpot (dowry), Ayokpa (adoption), Angang Chakthak (maintenance), Tongan Chaba (Partition), Lanthum (property), Nupi Maral (women's property), Aoon lou (dowry paddy-field), and Khubham Shilhouba or Sharuk Thungba or Tamba (inheritance).

----------------------------------------------

REFERENCES:
1. Mutuwa, Tombi: Imphal, Vol. I (Cultural History of Kangleipak, 2-3) (1975).
2. Roy, J., History of Manipur, 24 and 174-75 (1958).
3. Mukna Kangzei is a combination of free-hand wrestling and free-style hockey, all are Meetei origin, an indegenous game. It was very popular till very recently.
4. Roy, J.: History of Manipur, 59 (1958).
5. Hastings, James: Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. VIII, 402 (1964).
6. Roy, J: History of Manipur, 106 (1958).
7. Ibid., 177.
8. Ibid., 178-179.
9. Moirangthem, Kirti: Manipuri Samaj Hougatlakpa Amasung Chaokhatlakpa, 84 (1977).
10. Hastings, James: Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. VIII, 402 (1964).
11. Ibid., 402.
12. Wahengbam, Ibohal: Who was Nongda Lairen Pakhangba (MS), 21.
13. Ibid., p. 22.
14. Ibid.
15. Rajkumar, Jhalajit: History of Manipur, 49-50 (1965).
16. Kh. Yaima: "Poireitoin Khunthokpa", 1 (1971).
17. Johnstone, James: My three Years Experience in Manipur and Naga Hills, 117-119 (1971).
"Sir James Johnstone was a Political Agent in Manipur during the reign of King Chandrakirti (from 1850 to 1886 A.D.)".
18. Roy, J.: History of Manipur, 34 (1958). "Unlike the Hindu outcaste 'Lois' of Manipur do not carry the outcaste characteristics because there are instances of it. In the year 1250 A.D. some Chinese prisoners were allowed to settle at a place called SusaKameng. Their descendants are still living as Loi community, in the Kameng village of Manipur. Chinese were treated in a sense as Loi or outcaste".
19. Moirangthem, Kirti: Manipuri Samaj Hougatlakpa Amasung Chaokhatlakpa, 25 (1977).
20. Ibid., pp. 25-26.
21. Ibid., pp. 28-35.
22. Yumlembam, Thoibee: Yumballongee Hourakpham (Origin of Family Law): The Kangleikhol, No. 41, pp. 13-16 (December 1982).

Under the Veil (poem written in Iran)

Veil is a part of the Law in the land of Iran;
The Queshm Airport issued
Three big veils of the same size;
One each to my wife and two daughters.
All were all right
Except the younger daughter's;
The clothe was longer than her height
So it was trailing behind.
Her freedom swallowed brown.
My mind was captured with her's
The world seemed covered with the veil.
Veiled bodies moved around young girls
Of Chinese or European colours
As they flew from others for Visa Extension.
Every woman and girl came out under the viel
Concealed their body and head.
Their eyes were free to see
Their mouths were free to talk
But where has gone their body to move?
The movement of physical freedom
Went down under the nuclear veil.
My breathing too went deeper senseless
Till it merged into the windy sands boundless.
----------------------------------------------